Annotation of OpenXM/doc/issac2000/design-outline.tex, Revision 1.12
1.12 ! takayama 1: % $OpenXM: OpenXM/doc/issac2000/design-outline.tex,v 1.11 2000/01/16 06:02:41 takayama Exp $
1.2 takayama 2:
3: \section{Design Outline}
4:
5: As Schefstr\"om clarified in \cite{schefstrom},
6: integration of tools and softwares has three dimensions:
7: data, control, and user interface.
8:
9: Data integration concerns with the exchange of data between different
10: softwares or same softwares.
11: OpenMath \cite{OpenMath} and MP (Multi Protocol) \cite{GKW} are,
12: for example, general purpose mathematical data protocols.
1.6 takayama 13: They provide standard ways to express mathematical objects.
1.2 takayama 14: For example,
15: \begin{verbatim}
16: <OMOBJ> <OMI> 123 </OMI> </OMOBJ>
17: \end{verbatim}
1.3 takayama 18: means the (OpenMath) integer $123$ in OpenMath/XML expression.
1.2 takayama 19:
20: Control integration concerns with the establishment and management of
1.3 takayama 21: inter-software communications.
1.6 takayama 22: Control involves, for example, a way to ask computations to other processes
1.3 takayama 23: and a method to interrupt computations on servers from a client.
1.2 takayama 24: RPC, HTTP, MPI, PVM are regarded as a general purpose control protocols or
1.3 takayama 25: infrastructures.
1.2 takayama 26: MCP (Mathematical Communication Protocol)
1.10 takayama 27: by Wang \cite{iamc} is such a protocol for mathematics.
1.2 takayama 28:
1.9 takayama 29: Although data and control are orthogonal to each other,
1.2 takayama 30: real world requires both.
1.4 ohara 31: NetSolve \cite{netsolve}, OpenMath$+$MCP, MP$+$MCP \cite{iamc},
1.6 takayama 32: and MathLink \cite{mathlink} provide both data and control integration.
1.10 takayama 33: Each integration method has their own features determined by their
1.9 takayama 34: own design goals.
1.6 takayama 35: OpenXM (Open message eXchange protocol for Mathematics)
36: is a project aiming to integrate data, control and user interfaces
1.9 takayama 37: with design goals motivated by the followings.
1.2 takayama 38: \begin{enumerate}
1.10 takayama 39: \item Noro has been involved in the development of
40: a computer algebra system Risa/Asir \cite{asir}.
1.7 takayama 41: An interface for interactive distributed computations was introduced
1.9 takayama 42: to Risa/Asir
43: %% version 950831 released
44: in 1995.
1.10 takayama 45: The model of computation was RPC (remote procedure call).
1.9 takayama 46: A robust interruption protocol was provided
47: by two communication channels
48: like the File Transfer Protocol (ftp).
49: As an application of this protocol,
50: a parallel speed-up was achieved for a Gr\"obner basis computation
1.5 noro 51: to determine all odd order replicable functions
1.8 takayama 52: (Noro and McKay \cite{noro-mckay}).
1.9 takayama 53: However, the protocol was local in Asir and we thought that we should
1.2 takayama 54: design an open protocol.
1.6 takayama 55: \item Takayama has developed
1.9 takayama 56: a special purpose system Kan/sm1 \cite{kan},
1.7 takayama 57: which is a Gr\"obner engine for the ring of differential operators $D$.
1.9 takayama 58: In order to implement algorithms in $D$-modules due to Oaku
1.2 takayama 59: (see, e.g., \cite{sst-book}),
1.9 takayama 60: factorizations and primary ideal decompositions are necessary.
1.3 takayama 61: Kan/sm1 does not have an implementation for these and called
1.8 takayama 62: Risa/Asir as a UNIX external program.
1.2 takayama 63: This approach was not satisfactory.
64: Especially, we could not write a clean interface code between these
65: two systems.
66: We thought that it is necessary to provide a data and control protocol
1.5 noro 67: for Risa/Asir to work as a server of factorization and primary ideal
1.2 takayama 68: decomposition.
1.10 takayama 69: \item We have been profitted from increasing number
1.9 takayama 70: of mathematical softwares.
1.7 takayama 71: These are usually ``expert'' systems in one area of mathematics
1.2 takayama 72: such as ideals, groups, numbers, polytopes, and so on.
1.10 takayama 73: They have their own interfaces and data formats,
74: which are fine for intensive users of these systems.
75: However, a unified system will be more convenient
76: for users who want to explore a new area of mathematics with these
77: softwares or users who need these systems only occasionally.
1.7 takayama 78:
1.5 noro 79: \item We believe that an open integrated system is a future of mathematical
1.2 takayama 80: softwares.
1.3 takayama 81: However, it might be just a dream without realizability.
1.9 takayama 82: We want to build a prototype of such an open system by using
1.2 takayama 83: existing standards, technologies and several mathematical softwares.
84: We want to see how far we can go with this approach.
85: \end{enumerate}
86:
87: Motivated with these, we started the OpenXM project with the following
88: fundamental architecture.
89: \begin{enumerate}
1.4 ohara 90: \item Communication is an exchange of messages. The messages are classified into
1.2 takayama 91: three types:
1.9 takayama 92: DATA, COMMAND, and SPECIAL.
1.10 takayama 93: They are called OX (OpenXM) messages.
94: Among the three types,
1.9 takayama 95: {\it OX data messages} wrap mathematical data.
1.3 takayama 96: We use standards of mathematical data formats such as OpenMath and MP
1.10 takayama 97: as well as our own data format {\it CMO}
98: ({\it Common Mathematical Object format}).
1.4 ohara 99: \item Servers, which provide services to other processes, are stack machines.
100: The stack machine is called the
101: {\it OX stack machine}.
102: Existing mathematical softwares are wrapped with this stack machine.
103: Minimal requirements for a target software wrapped with the OX stack machine
1.2 takayama 104: are as follows:
105: \begin{enumerate}
1.4 ohara 106: \item The target must have a serialized interface such as a character based
1.2 takayama 107: interface.
1.3 takayama 108: \item An output of the target must be understandable for computer programs;
1.4 ohara 109: it should follow a grammar that can be parsed with other softwares.
1.2 takayama 110: \end{enumerate}
1.7 takayama 111: \item Any server may have a hybrid interface;
1.10 takayama 112: it may accept and execute not only stack machine commands,
113: but also its original command sequences.
1.7 takayama 114: For example,
1.12 ! takayama 115: if we send the following string to the {\tt ox\_asir} server
1.9 takayama 116: (OpenXM server based on Risa/Asir) \\
117: \verb+ " fctr(x^100-y^100); " + \\
1.8 takayama 118: and call the stanck machine command \\
1.9 takayama 119: \verb+ SM_executeStringByLocalParser + \\
1.8 takayama 120: then the server executes the asir command \\
1.9 takayama 121: \verb+ fctr(x^100-y^100); +
122: (factorize $x^{100}-y^{100}$ over ${\bf Q}$)
123: and pushes the result onto the stack.
1.2 takayama 124: \end{enumerate}
1.10 takayama 125: OpenXM package is implemented on above fundamental architecture.
1.2 takayama 126: For example, the following is a command sequence to ask $1+1$ from
1.9 takayama 127: the Asir client to the {\tt ox\_sm1} server:
1.2 takayama 128: \begin{verbatim}
129: P = sm1_start();
130: ox_push_cmo(P,1); ox_push_cmo(P,1);
131: ox_execute_string(P,"add"); ox_pop_cmo(P);
132: \end{verbatim}
1.9 takayama 133: Here, {\tt ox\_sm1} is an OpenXM server based on Kan/sm1.
134:
1.11 takayama 135: The OpenXM package is implemented on the OpenXM for TCP/IP,
1.10 takayama 136: which uses the client-server model.
1.6 takayama 137: The OpenXM on MPI \cite{MPI} is currently running on Risa/Asir
1.7 takayama 138: as we will see in Section \ref{section:homog}.
1.10 takayama 139: In this paper, we discuss only on systems for TCP/IP
140: to concentrate on the core part of our design.
141:
142:
1.6 takayama 143:
1.2 takayama 144:
145:
1.1 takayama 146:
FreeBSD-CVSweb <freebsd-cvsweb@FreeBSD.org>