Annotation of OpenXM/doc/issac2000/design-outline.tex, Revision 1.6
1.6 ! takayama 1: % $OpenXM: OpenXM/doc/issac2000/design-outline.tex,v 1.5 2000/01/11 05:35:48 noro Exp $
1.2 takayama 2:
3: \section{Design Outline}
4:
5: As Schefstr\"om clarified in \cite{schefstrom},
6: integration of tools and softwares has three dimensions:
7: data, control, and user interface.
8:
9: Data integration concerns with the exchange of data between different
10: softwares or same softwares.
11: OpenMath \cite{OpenMath} and MP (Multi Protocol) \cite{GKW} are,
12: for example, general purpose mathematical data protocols.
1.6 ! takayama 13: They provide standard ways to express mathematical objects.
1.2 takayama 14: For example,
15: \begin{verbatim}
16: <OMOBJ> <OMI> 123 </OMI> </OMOBJ>
17: \end{verbatim}
1.3 takayama 18: means the (OpenMath) integer $123$ in OpenMath/XML expression.
1.2 takayama 19:
20: Control integration concerns with the establishment and management of
1.3 takayama 21: inter-software communications.
1.6 ! takayama 22: Control involves, for example, a way to ask computations to other processes
1.3 takayama 23: and a method to interrupt computations on servers from a client.
1.2 takayama 24: RPC, HTTP, MPI, PVM are regarded as a general purpose control protocols or
1.3 takayama 25: infrastructures.
1.2 takayama 26: MCP (Mathematical Communication Protocol)
27: by Wang \cite{iamc} is such a protocol specialized to mathematics.
28:
29: Although, data and control are orthogonal to each other,
30: real world requires both.
1.4 ohara 31: NetSolve \cite{netsolve}, OpenMath$+$MCP, MP$+$MCP \cite{iamc},
1.6 ! takayama 32: and MathLink \cite{mathlink} provide both data and control integration.
1.2 takayama 33: Each integration method has their own special features due to their
34: own design goals and design motivations.
1.6 ! takayama 35: OpenXM (Open message eXchange protocol for Mathematics)
! 36: is a project aiming to integrate data, control and user interfaces
! 37: with itw own set of design goals.
1.2 takayama 38: To explain our design outline, we start with a list of
39: our motivations.
40: \begin{enumerate}
1.6 ! takayama 41: \item Noro has developed a general
1.2 takayama 42: purpose computer algebra system Risa/Asir \cite{asir}.
1.4 ohara 43: A set of functions for interactive distributed computations were introduced
1.3 takayama 44: in Risa/Asir version 950831 released in 1995.
1.2 takayama 45: The model of computation was RPC (remote procedure call)
46: and it had its own serialization method for objects.
47: A robust interruption method was provided by having two communication channels
1.6 ! takayama 48: like ftp.
1.4 ohara 49: As an application of this robust and interactive distributed computation
1.5 noro 50: system, speed-up was achieved for a huge Gr\"obner basis computation
51: to determine all odd order replicable functions
52: by Noro and McKay \cite{noro-mckay}.
53: However, the protocol was closed in Asir and we thought that we should
1.2 takayama 54: design an open protocol.
1.6 ! takayama 55: \item Takayama has developed
1.2 takayama 56: a special purpose computer algebra system Kan/sm1 \cite{kan},
1.3 takayama 57: which is a Gr\"obner engine for the ring of differential operators $D$ and
1.2 takayama 58: a package for computational algebraic geometry via D-module computations.
59: In order to implement algorithms in D-modules due to Oaku
60: (see, e.g., \cite{sst-book}),
61: factorizations and primary ideal decompositions were necessary.
1.3 takayama 62: Kan/sm1 does not have an implementation for these and called
1.5 noro 63: Risa/Asir as a C library or a UNIX external program.
1.2 takayama 64: This approach was not satisfactory.
65: Especially, we could not write a clean interface code between these
66: two systems.
67: We thought that it is necessary to provide a data and control protocol
1.5 noro 68: for Risa/Asir to work as a server of factorization and primary ideal
1.2 takayama 69: decomposition.
70: \item The number of mathematical softwares is increasing rapidly in the last
1.3 takayama 71: decade of the 20th century.
1.2 takayama 72: These are usually ``expert'' systems for one area of mathematics
73: such as ideals, groups, numbers, polytopes, and so on.
1.3 takayama 74: They have their own interfaces and data formats.
1.4 ohara 75: Interfaces are usually specialized to a specific field of mathematics
1.2 takayama 76: or poor because developers do not have time for designing user interface
77: languages.
78: It is fine for intensive and serious users of these systems.
79: %% x2 stands for x^2, specialized for polynomial ring.
80: However, for users who want to explore a new area of mathematics with these
1.3 takayama 81: softwares or users who need these systems only occasionally,
1.4 ohara 82: a unified system will be more convenient.
1.2 takayama 83: For example, if we can call and use mathematical softwares
84: like CoCoa, GAP, Macaulay2, Porta, Singular, Snapea, $\ldots$
1.6 ! takayama 85: from Aldor, Asir, Axiom, Maple, Magma, muPAD, Mathematica, and so on,
1.2 takayama 86: it will be wonderful in research and education
87: of mathematics. This is an unification of user interfaces of mathematical
88: softwares.
1.5 noro 89: \item We believe that an open integrated system is a future of mathematical
1.2 takayama 90: softwares.
1.3 takayama 91: However, it might be just a dream without realizability.
1.5 noro 92: We want to build a prototype system of such an open system by using
1.2 takayama 93: existing standards, technologies and several mathematical softwares.
94: We want to see how far we can go with this approach.
95: \end{enumerate}
96:
97: Motivated with these, we started the OpenXM project with the following
98: fundamental architecture.
99: \begin{enumerate}
1.4 ohara 100: \item Communication is an exchange of messages. The messages are classified into
1.2 takayama 101: three types:
102: DATA, COMMAND, and others.
103: The messages are called OX (OpenXM) messages.
1.3 takayama 104: Mathematical data are wrapped with {\it OX messages}.
105: We use standards of mathematical data formats such as OpenMath and MP
106: and our own data format ({\it CMO --- Common Mathematical Object format})
1.2 takayama 107: as data expressions.
1.4 ohara 108: \item Servers, which provide services to other processes, are stack machines.
109: The stack machine is called the
110: {\it OX stack machine}.
111: Existing mathematical softwares are wrapped with this stack machine.
112: Minimal requirements for a target software wrapped with the OX stack machine
1.2 takayama 113: are as follows:
114: \begin{enumerate}
1.4 ohara 115: \item The target must have a serialized interface such as a character based
1.2 takayama 116: interface.
1.3 takayama 117: \item An output of the target must be understandable for computer programs;
1.4 ohara 118: it should follow a grammar that can be parsed with other softwares.
1.2 takayama 119: \end{enumerate}
120: \end{enumerate}
1.3 takayama 121: We are implementing a package, OpenXM package,
122: which aims to realize our wishes stated as motivations.
1.2 takayama 123: It is based on above fundamental architecture.
124: For example, the following is a command sequence to ask $1+1$ from
1.5 noro 125: the Asir client to the OX sm1 server:
1.2 takayama 126: \begin{verbatim}
127: P = sm1_start();
128: ox_push_cmo(P,1); ox_push_cmo(P,1);
129: ox_execute_string(P,"add"); ox_pop_cmo(P);
130: \end{verbatim}
131: The current system, OpenXM on TCP/IP,
1.3 takayama 132: uses client-server model and the TCP/IP is used for interprocess
1.2 takayama 133: communications.
1.6 ! takayama 134: The OpenXM on MPI \cite{MPI} is currently running on Risa/Asir
! 135: as we will see Section \ref{section:homog}.
1.3 takayama 136: However, we focus only on the system based on TCP/IP in this paper.
1.6 ! takayama 137:
1.2 takayama 138:
139:
1.1 takayama 140:
FreeBSD-CVSweb <freebsd-cvsweb@FreeBSD.org>