[BACK]Return to design-outline.tex CVS log [TXT][DIR] Up to [local] / OpenXM / doc / issac2000

File: [local] / OpenXM / doc / issac2000 / design-outline.tex (download)

Revision 1.6, Sat Jan 15 02:24:18 2000 UTC (24 years, 4 months ago) by takayama
Branch: MAIN
Changes since 1.5: +14 -13 lines

We are working like Tamura-kun.
We are going to commit every one hour to generate the final
version.  However, of course, we need a time to take a lunch.

% $OpenXM: OpenXM/doc/issac2000/design-outline.tex,v 1.6 2000/01/15 02:24:18 takayama Exp $

\section{Design Outline} 

As Schefstr\"om clarified in \cite{schefstrom},
integration of tools and softwares has three dimensions:
data, control, and user interface.

Data integration concerns with the exchange of data between different
softwares or same softwares.
OpenMath \cite{OpenMath} and MP (Multi Protocol) \cite{GKW} are,
for example, general purpose mathematical data protocols.
They provide standard ways to express mathematical objects.
For example,
\begin{verbatim}
 <OMOBJ>  <OMI> 123 </OMI> </OMOBJ>
\end{verbatim}
means the (OpenMath) integer $123$ in OpenMath/XML expression.

Control integration concerns with the establishment and management of
inter-software communications.
Control involves, for example, a way to ask computations to other processes
and a method to interrupt computations on servers from a client.
RPC, HTTP, MPI, PVM are regarded as a general purpose control protocols or
infrastructures.
MCP (Mathematical Communication Protocol)
by Wang \cite{iamc} is such a protocol specialized to mathematics.

Although, data and control are orthogonal to each other,
real world requires both.
NetSolve \cite{netsolve}, OpenMath$+$MCP, MP$+$MCP \cite{iamc},
and MathLink \cite{mathlink} provide both data and control integration.
Each integration method has their own special features due to their
own design goals and design motivations.
OpenXM (Open message eXchange protocol for Mathematics)
is a project aiming to integrate data, control and user interfaces
with itw own set of design goals.
To explain our design outline, we start with a list of
our motivations.
\begin{enumerate}
\item Noro has developed a general
purpose computer algebra system Risa/Asir \cite{asir}.
A set of functions for interactive distributed computations were introduced
in Risa/Asir version 950831 released in 1995.
The model of computation was RPC (remote procedure call)
and it had its own serialization method for objects.
A robust interruption method was provided by having two communication channels
like ftp.
As an application of this robust and interactive distributed computation
system, speed-up was achieved for a huge Gr\"obner basis computation
to determine all odd order replicable functions 
by Noro and McKay \cite{noro-mckay}.
However, the protocol was closed in Asir and we thought that we should
design an open protocol.
\item Takayama has developed
a special purpose computer algebra system Kan/sm1 \cite{kan},
which is a Gr\"obner engine for the ring of differential operators $D$ and
a package for computational algebraic geometry via D-module computations.
In order to implement algorithms in D-modules due to Oaku 
(see, e.g., \cite{sst-book}),
factorizations and primary ideal decompositions were necessary.
Kan/sm1 does not have an implementation for these and called
Risa/Asir as a C library or a UNIX external program.
This approach was not satisfactory.
Especially, we could not write a clean interface code between these
two systems.
We thought that it is necessary to provide a data and control protocol
for Risa/Asir to work as a server of factorization and primary ideal
decomposition.
\item The number of mathematical softwares is increasing rapidly in the last
decade of the 20th century.
These are usually ``expert'' systems for one area of mathematics
such as ideals, groups, numbers, polytopes, and so on.
They have their own interfaces and data formats.
Interfaces are usually specialized to a specific field of mathematics
or poor because developers do not have time for designing user interface
languages.
It is fine for intensive and serious users of these systems.
%% x2 stands for x^2, specialized for polynomial ring.
However, for users who want to explore a new area of mathematics with these
softwares or users who need these systems only occasionally,
a unified system will be more convenient.
For example, if we can call and use mathematical softwares
like CoCoa, GAP, Macaulay2, Porta, Singular, Snapea, $\ldots$
from Aldor, Asir, Axiom, Maple, Magma, muPAD, Mathematica, and so on,
it will be wonderful in research and education
of mathematics. This is an unification of user interfaces of mathematical
softwares.
\item  We believe that an open integrated system is a future of mathematical
softwares.
However, it might be just a dream without realizability.
We want to build a prototype system of such an open system by using
existing standards, technologies and several mathematical softwares.
We want to see how far we can go with this approach.
\end{enumerate}

Motivated with these, we started the OpenXM project with the following
fundamental architecture.
\begin{enumerate}
\item Communication is an exchange of messages. The messages are classified into
three types:
DATA, COMMAND, and others.
The messages are called OX (OpenXM) messages.
Mathematical data are wrapped with {\it OX messages}.
We use standards of mathematical data formats such as OpenMath and MP
and our own data format ({\it CMO --- Common Mathematical Object format})
as data expressions.
\item Servers, which provide services to other processes, are stack machines.
The stack machine is called the
{\it OX stack machine}.
Existing mathematical softwares are wrapped with this stack machine.
Minimal requirements for a target software wrapped with the OX stack machine
are as follows:
\begin{enumerate}
\item The target must have a serialized interface such as a character based
interface.
\item An output of the target must be understandable for computer programs;
it should follow a grammar that can be parsed with other softwares.
\end{enumerate}
\end{enumerate}
We are implementing a package, OpenXM package,  
which aims to realize our wishes stated as motivations.
It is based on above fundamental architecture.
For example, the following is a command sequence to ask $1+1$ from
the Asir client to the OX sm1 server:
\begin{verbatim}
  P = sm1_start();
  ox_push_cmo(P,1); ox_push_cmo(P,1);
  ox_execute_string(P,"add"); ox_pop_cmo(P);
\end{verbatim}
The current system, OpenXM on TCP/IP, 
uses client-server model and the TCP/IP is used for interprocess
communications.
The OpenXM on MPI \cite{MPI} is currently running on Risa/Asir
as we will see Section \ref{section:homog}.
However, we focus only on the system based on TCP/IP in this paper.